Reflections on Prince, Public Welfare Offenses, American Cyanamid, and the Wisdom of the Common Law

Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):427-438 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The fundamental requirement of Anglo-American criminal law is that crime must consist of the concurrence of a guilty mind—a mens rea—with a guilty act—an actus reus. And yet, the criminal law is shot through with discordant lumps of strict liability—crimes for which no mens rea is required. Ignoring the conventional normative objections to this aberration, I distinguish two different types of strict criminal liability: the type that arose at common law and the type associated with the public welfare offenses that are the product of twentieth and twenty-first century legislation. Using famous cases as exemplars, I analyze the two types of strict liability, and then examine the purposes served and incentives created by subjecting individuals to strict liability. I conclude that common law strict liability is rational in that it advances the purposes of the criminal law, while the public welfare offenses are at best pointless and at worst counterproductive. I suggest that in this respect the common law contains more wisdom than the results of the legislative process.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Fault Matter?Vera Bergelson - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):375-392.
Action, the Act Requirement and Criminal Liability.Antony Duff - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:69-103.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Legal and moral responsibility.Antony Duff - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Aquinas on crime.Charles P. Nemeth - 2008 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is There a Case for Strict Liability?Larry Alexander - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):531-538.
What is a Crime?Grant Lamond - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (4):609-632.
Strict product liability and the unfairness objection.Andrew Piker - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):885-893.
Mens Rea by the Numbers.Gideon Yaffe - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):393-409.


Added to PP

14 (#862,846)

6 months
2 (#725,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references