Educating Students to Consistency via Argumentation

Informal Logic 39 (3):263-286 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, the role played in learning to argue by an essential and yet under-researched epistemic and argumentative norm is discussed, namely, the consistency requirement. An argumentative intervention is presented, that is designed to enhance the understanding of this norm among high school students, to enable them to recognize contradictions in the process of argumentation and to familiarize them with the argumentative strategies related to the reductio ad absurdum. There follows a description of how the designed intervention was implemented in two Italian high schools, which served as an exploratory case study, and the results obtained are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-01

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Douglas Walton’s Contributions in Education.Chrysi Rapanta - 2022 - Informal Logic 44 (1):139-170.

Add more citations