The Miracle Argument for realism: An important lesson to be learned by generalizing from Carrier’s counter-examples

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):267-282 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A critique to the significance of Gettier counter-examples.Cao Jianbo - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):675-687.
What is wrong with the miracle argument??☆.Martin Carrier - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):23-36.
What is right with the miracle argument: Establishing a taxonomy of natural kinds.Martin Carrier - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):391-409.
The miraculous choice argument for realism.Eric Barnes - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (2):97 - 120.
Levin and Ghins on the “no miracle” argument and naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Proving Necessity.James A. Martin - 1975 - Philosophy Research Archives 1:352-363.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
60 (#266,836)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Experience and Prediction.William R. Dennes - 1939 - Philosophical Review 48 (5):536-538.
Normative naturalism.Larry Laudan - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):44-59.
Discovery and justification.Carl R. Kordig - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):110-117.
What is wrong with the miracle argument??☆.Martin Carrier - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):23-36.

View all 11 references / Add more references