Existential hypotheses. Realistic versus phenomenalistic interpretations

Philosophy of Science 17 (1):35-62 (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The intention of the present essay is to urge a reconsideration of the Realism-Phenomenalism-Issue, mainly and primarily in regard to the interpretation of scientific hypotheses; secondarily also relating to the basic problems of epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
323 (#59,630)

6 months
37 (#94,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.
Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity.Peter Olen - 2016 - London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Science, metaphysics and method.James Ladyman - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):31-51.
Choosing the realist framework.Stathis Psillos - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):301 - 316.
Vienna circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 53 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
Language, Truth, and Logic.A. J. Ayer - 1936 - Philosophy 23 (85):173-176.
The Mind and its place in nature.C. D. Broad - 1925 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 103:145-146.

View all 39 references / Add more references