Exploring Web-Based University Policy Statements on Plagiarism by Research-Intensive Higher Education Institutions

Journal of Academic Ethics 13 (2):167-196 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Plagiarism may distress universities in the US, but there is little agreement as to exactly what constitutes plagiarism. While there is ample research on plagiarism, there is scant literature on the content of university policies regarding it. Using a systematic sample, we qualitatively analyzed 20 Carnegie-classified universities that are “Very High in Research.” This included 15 public state universities and five high-profile private universities. We uncovered highly varied and even contradictory policies at these institutions. Notable policy variations existed for verbatim plagiarism, intentional plagiarism and unauthorized student collaboration at the studied institutions. We conclude by advising that the American Association of University Professors and other overarching academic bodies confer and come to accord on the disposition of these issues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use?Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism.Naveed Imran - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (4):25-44.
The Instructional Challenges of Student Plagiarism.Erika Löfström & Pauliina Kupila - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-29

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
19 (#130,686)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?