Claiming ownership in the technosciences: Patents, priority and productivity

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):188-201 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Stuart Mill on the Ownership and Use of Land.Stephen Nathanson - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):10-16.
Who “Owns” Cells and Tissues?Karen Lebacqz - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):353-368.
GM crops: Patently wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.
The Social Disutility of Software Ownership.David M. Douglas - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):485-502.
Surgical patents and patients — the ethical dilemmas.Tadeusz Tołłoczko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):61-69.
Productivity and the nature of work.Terrence H. White - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):55 - 61.
Gene patents.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (3):9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-19

Downloads
45 (#353,711)

6 months
13 (#195,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Radick
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Presidential address: Experimenting with the scientific past.Gregory Radick - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Science 49 (2):153-172.
The plant breeding industry after pure line theory: Lessons from the National Institute of Agricultural Botany.Dominic Berry - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46 (1):25-37.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations