Understanding doctors' ethical challenges as role virtue conflicts

Bioethics 27 (1):20-27 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that doctors' ethical challenges can be usefully conceptualised as role virtue conflicts. The hospital environment requires doctors to be simultaneously good doctors, good team members, good learners and good employees. I articulate a possible set of role virtues for each of these four roles, as a basis for a virtue ethics approach to analysing doctors' ethical challenges. Using one junior doctor's story, I argue that understanding doctors' ethical challenges as role virtue conflicts enables recognition of important moral considerations that are overlooked by other approaches to ethical analysis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The junior doctor as ethically unique.R. McDougall - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):268-270.
Futile treatment, junior doctors and role virtues.R. McDougall - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11):646-649.
Measuring ‘virtue’ in medicine.Ben Kotzee & Agnieszka Ignatowicz - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (2):149-161.
Doctors' Decisions: Ethical Conflicts in Medical Practice.Ronald Preston - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (1):55-55.
Ethics in terminal care.E. Wilkes - 1989 - In Gordon Reginald Dunstan & Elliot A. Shinebourne (eds.), Doctors' decisions: ethical conflicts in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 197--204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-05

Downloads
13 (#288,494)

6 months
63 (#248,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references