The Objectivity Of Touch

Abstract

Assumption: Sensory modalities are individuated by their proper objects. Hearing is the direct perception of sounds, sight the direct perception of colours, etc. Objection: There is no single type of proper sensibles in the case of touch (temperature, solidity, hardness, humidity, texture, weight, vibration...). Answer : 1. accept to distinguish the sense of pressure (touch strictly speaking) from the sense of temperature. 2. argue that pressures are the direct perceptual objects through which one perceives weight, texture, solidity.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The primary objects of perception.David H. Sanford - 1976 - Mind 85 (April):189-208.
Feeling Fit For Function: Haptic Touch and Aesthetic Experience.Tom Roberts - 2022 - British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (1):49-61.
The unity of haptic touch.Matthew Fulkerson - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):493 - 516.
Thermal Perception and its Relation to Touch.Richard Gray - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (25).
Touch Without Touching.Matthew Fulkerson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
Sensible qualities: The case of sound.Robert Pasnau - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):27-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-28

Downloads
168 (#115,415)

6 months
45 (#105,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Olivier Massin
Université de Neuchâtel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references