Authors
Marek Picha
Masaryk University
Abstract
Thought experiments are frequently vague and obscure hypothetical scenarios that are difficult to assess. The paper proposes a simple model of thought experiments. In the first part, I introduce two contemporary frameworks for thought experiment analysis: an experimentalist approach that relies on similarities between real and thought experiment, and a reasonist approach focusing on the answers provided by thought experimenting. Further, I articulate a minimalist approach in which thought experiment is considered strictly as doxastic mechanism based on imagination. I introduce the basic analytical tool that allows us to differentiate an experimental core from an attached argumentation. The last section is reserved for discussion. I address several possible questions concerning adequacy of minimalistic definition and analysis.
Keywords thought experiments  minimalism  Galileo  Sorensen  Gendler  Rescher  analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oup Usa.
Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?John D. Norton - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Místo myšlenkových experimentů ve filozofii.Filip Tvrdý - 2018 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 40 (2):211-229.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment.Marek Picha - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oup Usa.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Empirical Thought Experiments: A Trascendental-Operational View.Buzzoni Marco - 2010 - Epistemologia. An Italian Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33:05-26.
Experiments and Thought Experiments in Natural Science.David Atkinson - 2001 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 232:209-226.
Thought Experiments.Roy A. Sorensen - 1992 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Thought Experiments in Ethics: A Contextualist Approach to the Grounding Problem.Leslie Anne Harland - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-12-05

Total views
232 ( #48,239 of 2,507,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #51,566 of 2,507,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes