- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366 (1996)
Abstract
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, pp. 333-66. 1996.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- d-scholarship.pitt.edu
(no proxy) - d-scholarship.pitt.edu [2] (no proxy)
- d-scholarship.pitt.edu [3] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org [2] (no proxy)
- pitt.edu (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [2] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Intuitions in Science: Thought Experiments as Argument Pumps.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - In Anthony R. Booth & Darrell P. Rowbottom (eds.), Intuitions. Oxford University Press. pp. 119-134.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.
Thought experiments and mental simulations.John Zeimbekis - 2011 - In Katerina Ierodiakonou & Sophie Roux (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Brill.
Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism.John D. Norton - 2002 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 44-66.
Reconstruction, Justification and Incompatibility in Norton’s Account of Thought Experiments.Boris Grozdanoff - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):69-79.
When are thought experiments poor ones?Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):305-322.
Intuition pumps and the proper use of thought experiments.Elke Brendel - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (1):89–108.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
358 (#53,855)
6 months
44 (#88,300)
2009-01-28
Downloads
358 (#53,855)
6 months
44 (#88,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Imagination.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):397-424.
References found in this work
Thought experiments since the scientific revolution.James Robert Brown - 1986 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):1 – 15.
Seeing the laws of nature [author's response to Norton, 1993].James Robert Brown - 1993 - Metascience 3:38-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo