Standard-of-care propositions should permit informative comparisons

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):46 – 47 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160802684365

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
Reasonable Care: Equality as Objectivity. [REVIEW]Avihay Dorfman - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (4):369-407.
The ambiguity and the exigency: Clarifying 'standard of care' arguments in international research.Alex John London - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):379 – 397.
Chrysippus and the destruction of propositions: a defence of the standard interpretation.Michael B. Papazian - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):1-12.
Managed Care and the Expanding Scope of Primary Care Physicians' Duties: A Proposal to Redefine Explicitly the Standard of Care.Bernard Friedland - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (2):100-112.
A universal scale of comparison.Alan Clinton Bale - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):1-55.
What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research?Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):35 – 43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-08

Downloads
19 (#788,257)

6 months
7 (#417,242)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references