Authors’ response: Flying Kites and the Textility of Problematizing

Constructivist Foundations 15 (1):73-77 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: We briefly discuss how far we take metaphors for learning or doing mathematics while challenging the descriptive-prescriptive paradigm in favor of a larger view of research and language emphasizing the evocative and provocative texture of our work and Ingold’s writing. In so doing, we also bring forth an ethical dimension to research writing, which may help situate what we did not present, discuss and suggest in the target article: missing fragments, students’ backgrounds, teachers’ potential roles and direct implications or recommendations, for example. Finally, we also offer a reflection on how our study contributes to research through both its similarities to and distinctions from other conceptualisations. Jean-François Maheux & Robyn Gandell.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tensions in Describing Group Problematizing.David A. Reid - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (1):63-65.
Mathematics as a Coordination of (Inter)Actions.Anderson Norton - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (1):61-63.
Author's Response: On Posing|Solving Research.Jérôme Proulx & Jean-François Maheux - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):185-190.
A ‘problem’ To Be Managed?: Completing A Phd In The Arts And Humanities.Kathryn Owler - 2010 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (3):289-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references