Life without Gillick: Adolescent sexual and reproductive healthcare in Ireland

Clinical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The decision of the House of Lords in Gillick v West Norfolk Area Health Authority carved out a safe space for competent minors to confidentially access sexual and reproductive health care and advice in the UK. Ireland is one of the few common law jurisdictions that has not endorsed Gillick or a similar mature minor doctrine, nor has it securely legislated for the right to consent of those aged 16 and 17 years. The legal lacuna created by this deficiency has left young persons in Ireland seeking sexual and reproductive healthcare, and the clinicians who provide this, in a challenging place. While this void has been partially filled with policy statements by bodies such as the Irish College of General Practitioners and the Health Service Executive, nonetheless the legal shortcomings leave both a sense of insecurity, and real world difficulties for adolescents seeking to access to sexual and reproductive healthcare.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parents, Adolescents, and Consent for Research Participation.A. S. Iltis - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):332-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-26

Downloads
14 (#996,581)

6 months
14 (#254,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Donnelly
Georgia State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references