What’s the Problem with Dewey?

European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8 (1) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Democracy and Education Dewey has a rich conception of educational flourishing that stands at odds with the instrumentalism about learning endemic to much contemporary educational policy. And his vision posits deep dependencies between the different domains in which education is transformative: the transformation of the individual learner into an inquirer equipped to adapt in a changing environment and the transformations in the social world required for the provision of opportunities for such experiences to all. In this paper, I trace the roots of Dewey’s conception in his account of inquiry. I focus on the key concept of a ‘problem.’ For Dewey, inquiry begins with a problem, but his concept of a problem is challenging and lacks an adequate theoretical rationale. Problems start with disruptions in our environmental engagement that figure in non-knowing encounters. Dewey needs an account of these pre-cognitive disruptions and of what constitutes their resolution. I argue that the account can be found in the aesthetics of experience. This draws upon some of Dewey’s insights regarding our experience of art objects and it finds a central role for the aesthetics of experience as not only the prompt for inquiry and the unification of experience that settles inquiry, but also in what I call the ‘craft of inquiry’ – the very practice of inquiring. If this is right, any adequate account of learning, let alone a pedagogy fit to encourage learning, must have a central role for aesthetics as providing the conditions for the possibility of learning. A proper appreciation of Dewey signals the opportunity for a radical re-thinking of how to shape a pedagogy fit for educational flourishing – a pedagogy designed for inquirers. And it helps us understand better the deep dependencies between the projects of individual and social transformation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Incomplete Diagnosis.Alan G. Phillips Jr - 2007 - Ars Disputandi 7:1566-5399.
The philosophy of John Dewey.Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.) - 1939 - New York,: Tudor Pub. Co..
Dewey’s Darwin and Darwin’s Hume.Catherine Kemp - 2017 - The Pluralist 12 (2):1-26.
Checklist of Writings About John Dewey, 1887-1973.Jo Ann Boydston & Kathleen Poulos - 1974 - Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Qualities, Universals, Kinds, and the New Riddle of induction.F. Thomas Burke - 2002 - In F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), Dewey's logical theory: new studies and interpretations. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
The Problem of Ineffability in Dewey's Theory of Inquiry.Richard M. Gale - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):75-90.
La recepción de Dewey en España y Latinoamérica.Jaime Nubiola & Beatriz Sierra - 2001 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 6 (13):107-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-26

Downloads
21 (#733,267)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Forgetski Vygotsky: Or, a plea for bootstrapping accounts of learning.Michael Luntley - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (10):957-970.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Expectations without content.Michael Luntley - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (2):217-236.
Forgetski Vygotsky: Or, a plea for bootstrapping accounts of learning.Michael Luntley - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (10):957-970.
Extending the Pragmatist Tradition: Replies to Commentators.Philip Kitcher - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (1):97.

Add more references