Licence to kill? The question of just vs. unjust combatants

Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper questions the moral foundations of the equal war-right to kill in international law. Although there seems to be a moral difference between fighting a just and unjust war, this need not reflect on our moral assessment of soldiers, since unjust combatants can be non-culpable by virtue of excuse. Under the aspect of immunity from blame, an equal war-right to kill is upheld, and belligerent equality restored among innocents. It must therefore be proven that innocent threats can be justifiably killed. If this fails, there is nothing about the people who kill and are killed in war that justifies their killing. This leads to a strong presumption against war and to question the notion of just war. Further, there should be an incentive to increase protection of combatants in war

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
80 (#204,645)

6 months
11 (#338,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Mortal questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Just and Unjust Wars.M. Walzer - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (209):415-420.
Self-defense.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):283-310.
Innocence, self-defense and killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (3):193–221.
Collective War and Individualistic Ethics.Noam J. Zohar - 1993 - Political Theory 21 (4):606-622.

View all 8 references / Add more references