Playing with the metaphysical foundations of a self-related ethnographic study

Abstract

This article emphasises the academic possibilities of autoethnography using a philosophical and theoretical framework to underpin it. The author uses a proposed research project to illustrate how and why autoethnography should be considered an academic methodology appropriate for a Doctor of Philosophy study. Crotty’s research paradigm model informs the author’s theoretical framework with a focus on Social Constructionism and Symbolic Interactionism as it’s foundations. The intention of the article is to encourage other doctoral candidates to consider the scholarly attributes of autoethnography for their own research endeavours through the utilisation of an interpretivist research paradigm.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Methodological and Analytical Dilemmas in Autoethnographic Research.Elena Maydell - 2010 - Journal of Research Practice 6 (1):Article M5.
Autoethnography.Anne Bunde-Birouste, Fiona Byrne & Lynn Kemp - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 509-526.
How Autoethnography Works.Dmitry Rogozin - 2015 - Russian Sociological Review 14 (1):224-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-07

Downloads
138 (#133,863)

6 months
58 (#92,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations