Methodological and Analytical Dilemmas in Autoethnographic Research

Journal of Research Practice 6 (1):Article M5 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents an argument on the application of theoretical and methodological frameworks to the study of identity from an autoethnographic perspective. In order to guide the analysis process, the author employed social constructionism as the main theoretical foundation, whereas thematic analysis and positioning theory were deployed as the methodological frameworks. Further, in the process of using ethnographic methods to study the identity of Russian immigrants to New Zealand, the author found herself also needing to use autoethnography to interrogate and understand her own journey. The insider/outsider position of the author who belongs to the same minority group became the most vital tool in her identity construction. In this regard, it is impossible to engage fully with the autoethnographic research practice without understanding the impact of others on identity construction of self, and a strong theoretical and methodological scholarship can provide a valuable foundation for this process

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Autoethnography Works.Dmitry Rogozin - 2015 - Russian Sociological Review 14 (1):224-273.
Autoethnography.Anne Bunde-Birouste, Fiona Byrne & Lynn Kemp - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 509-526.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
44 (#109,065)

6 months
18 (#821,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references