Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Regardless of the inconsistencies between Plato and his inheritors, the late neo-Platonist Proclus offers poignant answers to several contemporary debatesimbedded in Socratic scholarship. In the following, we will concentrate on Proclus’s interpretation of the Socratic elenchos and the provocative concept of double ignorance by clarifying their appearance in The Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides and The Commentary on the Alcibiades I. In this endeavor we shall unpack how Proclus characterizes the elenchos as an authentic dialectic purifying its recipients from an evil caused by the conceit to knowledge, a condition which unfortunately almost all men suffer and require treatment.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,179

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Praise of the Mere Presence of Ignorance.Danielle A. Layne - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:253-267.
Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Parmenides. Proclus - 1987 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Glenn R. Morrow & John M. Dillon.


Added to PP

49 (#262,203)

6 months
1 (#510,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Danielle A. Layne
Gonzaga University

Citations of this work

Involuntary Evil and the Socratic Problem of Double Ignorance in Proclus.Danielle A. Layne - 2015 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (1):27-53.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references