Competing Values: A Respectful Critique of Narrative Research

Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):191-194 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Smythe and Murray presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight.Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Christine Grady - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):82-96.
Heterogeneities of experience, positionality, and method in user/survivor research.Timothy Kelly - 2016 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 23 (3):229-232.
Methodological Quandaries in Joint Israeli-Palestinian Peace Research.Julia Chaitin - 2009 - Journal of Research Practice 5 (1):Article M2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#610,935)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Gottlieb
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references