Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):82-96 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The understanding of appropriate ethical protections for participants of biomedical research has not been static. It has evolved over time, with the evolution of biomedical research as well as social values. Since World War II, there have been four major paradigms of research and research oversight operative in the United States. These paradigms incorporate different values and provide different approaches to research oversight and the protection of research participants.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gene Therapy Oversight: Lessons for Nanobiotechnology.Susan M. Wolf, Rishi Gupta & Peter Kohlhepp - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):659-684.
Catholic Social Teaching as a Framework for Research Ethics.Alan J. Kearns - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (2):145-159.
What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.David Wendler - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):161-180.
Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight.Steven Joffe - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):922-929.
Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
75 (#200,928)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?