- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Contra: Soll das sogenannte „Gene Editing“ mittels CRISPR/Cas9-Technologie an menschlichen Embryonen erforscht werden?
Ethik in der Medizin 29 (3):249-252 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Pro: Soll das sogenannte „Gene Editing“ mittels CRISPR/Cas9-Technologie an menschlichen Embryonen erforscht werden?Bernhard Rütsche - 2017 - Ethik in der Medizin 29 (3):243-247.
CRISPR/Cas9 and Germline Modification: New Difficulties in Obtaining Informed Consent.Joanna Smolenski - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):35-37.
Cutting Eugenics Out of CRISPR-Cas9.Carolyn Brokowski, Marya Pollack & Robert Pollack - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):263-279.
Edited Genes and Slippery Slopes: Dilemmas in the Ethics of Gene Editing.John Harris - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):281-284.
Der Hirntod und das Ende menschlichen Lebens.Johannes Meran & Sebastian Poliwoda - 1992 - Ethik in der Medizin 4 (4):165-171.
„Evidenzbasierte Ethik“? – Über hypothetische und kategorische Handlungsnormen in der Medizin.Sabine Salloch - 2012 - Ethik in der Medizin 24 (1):5-17.
Der manipulierbare Embryo.Markus Rothhaar, Martin Hähnel & Roland Kipke (eds.) - 2018 - Brill Mentis.
Ethical Issues in Genome Editing using Crispr/Cas9 System.E. Rodriguez - 2016 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 7 (2).
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-06
Downloads
26 (#631,520)
6 months
1 (#1,516,603)
2017-10-06
Downloads
26 (#631,520)
6 months
1 (#1,516,603)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Comparative ethical evaluation of epigenome editing and genome editing in medicine: first steps and future directions.Karla Alex & Eva C. Winkler - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics (doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108888):1-9.
Comparative ethical evaluation of epigenome editing and genome editing in medicine: first steps and future directions.Karla Alex & Eva C. Winkler - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (6):398-406.
Genscheren-Forschung an der menschlichen Keimbahn: Plädoyer für eine neue Debatte auch in Deutschland.Bettina Schöne-Seifert - 2017 - Ethik in der Medizin 29 (2):93-96.
References found in this work
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Julian Savulescu.
Beyond humanity?: the ethics of biomedical enhancement.Allen E. Buchanan - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 516--535.
Enhancements Are A Moral Obligation.John Harris - 2010 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing to Cure Serious Diseases: Treat the Patient, Not the Germ Line.Ante S. Lundberg & Rodger Novak - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):38-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-zhzfn uwo