- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ethical Issues in Genome Editing using Crispr/Cas9 System
Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 7 (2) (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical Issues in Genome Editing for Non-Human Organisms Using CRISPR/ Cas9 System.Rodriguez Eduardo - 2017 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 8 (2).
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing – new and old ethical issues arising from a revolutionary technology.Martina Baumann - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (2):139-159.
Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Human germline editing: a historical perspective.Michel Morange - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (4):34.
CRISPR-Cas9 Human Genome Editing: Challenges, Ethical Concerns and Implications.Otieno Mo - 2015 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (6).
Exploiting CRISPR / C as systems for biotechnology.Timothy R. Sampson & David S. Weiss - 2014 - Bioessays 36 (1):34-38.
CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.R. Alta Charo & Henry T. Greely - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):11-17.
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
The Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9.Paul Scherz - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):29-36.
Limits of Responsibility: Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation.J. Benjamin Hurlbut - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (5):11-14.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
The promise and peril of CRISPR gene drives.Gabriel E. Zentner & Michael J. Wade - 2017 - Bioessays 39 (10):1700109.
CRISPR as a Driving Force: The Model T of Biotechnology.Carlos Mariscal & Angel Petropanagos - 2016 - Monash Bioethics Review 34 (2):1-16.
Pro: Soll das sogenannte „Gene Editing“ mittels CRISPR/Cas9-Technologie an menschlichen Embryonen erforscht werden?Bernhard Rütsche - 2017 - Ethik in der Medizin 29 (3):243-247.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-21
Downloads
537 (#32,652)
6 months
60 (#71,803)
2017-12-21
Downloads
537 (#32,652)
6 months
60 (#71,803)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Integration and Harmonisation of Secular and Islamic Ethical Principles in Formulating Acceptable Ethical Guidelines for Modern Biotechnology in Malaysia.Nur Asmadayana Hasim, Latifah Amin, Zurina Mahadi, Nor Ashikin Mohamed Yusof, Anisah Che Ngah, Mashitoh Yaacob, Angelina Patrick Olesen & Azwira Abdul Aziz - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1797-1825.
A justice‐based argument for including sickle cell disease in CRISPR/Cas9 clinical research.Marilyn S. Baffoe-Bonnie - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (6):661-668.
A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands.Anne M. Dijkstra, Menno D. T. De Jong & Mirjam Schuijff - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-13.
CRISPR: Challenges to South African biotechnology law.S. Pillay & D. W. Thaldar - 2018 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 11 (2):89.
The Better I Can Be: In Defence of Human Enhancement for a New Genetic Equality.Vera Lúcia Carapeto Raposo - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (2).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo