- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
It is time to move beyond a culture of unexamined assumptions, recrimination, and blame to one of systematic analysis and ethical dialogue
American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):31 - 33 (2011)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Schleiermacher's Critique of Ethical Reason: Toward a Systematic Ethics.John Wallhausser - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):25 - 39.
Don't blame the 'bio' — blame the 'ethics': Varieties of (bio) ethics and the challenge of pluralism. [REVIEW]Max Charlesworth - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):10-17.
Economic democracy, social dialogue, and ethical analysis: Theory and practice.JorgeArturo Chaves - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):153 - 159.
How Philosophy Can Help You Feel Better.Peter B. Raabe - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):59-64.
Anselm on Ethics.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2004 - In Brian Davies & Brian Leftow (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 222-56.
A Framework for Facilitating Classroom Dialogue.Maughn Rollins Gregory - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (1):59-84.
Which is to blame: Instrumental rationality, or common knowledge?Matt Jones & Jun Zhang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):166-167.
How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):177-239.
Behind the Facade.Carol Cirka & Carla Messikomer - 2012 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 31 (1):79-107.
Reinforcing ethical decision making through corporate culture.Al Y. S. Chen, Roby B. Sawyers & Paul F. Williams - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):855-865.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-15
Downloads
44 (#360,396)
6 months
4 (#783,478)
2011-01-15
Downloads
44 (#360,396)
6 months
4 (#783,478)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
After Conflicts of Interest: From Procedural Short-Cut to Ethico-Political Debate.Christopher Mayes - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):245-255.
On the fragility of medical virtue in a neoliberal context: the case of commercial conflicts of interest in reproductive medicine.Christopher Mayes, Brette Blakely, Ian Kerridge, Paul Komesaroff, Ian Olver & Wendy Lipworth - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (1):97-111.
On the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interest.Christopher Mayes - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):217-218.
Responses to Peer Commentaries on “Clarifying Conflict of Interest”.Howard Brody - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):W4 - W5.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo