Authors
Howard Simmons
McMaster University (PhD)
Abstract
My subject is the theory of blame recently propounded by George Sher in his book, In Praise of Blame. I argue that although Sher has succeeded in capturing a number of genuine features of the concept of blame, there is an important element that he has omitted, which is the fact that necessarily, when A blames B for something and expresses this to B, A will realise that B is likely to find this unpleasant. The inclusion of the latter element renders the question of whether any agent ever deserves blame a more open one than Sher allows.
Keywords Blame  Moral responsibility  Determinism  Desert  Sher
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Blame for Traits.George Sher - 2001 - Noûs 35 (1):146–161.
Unwitting Behavior and Responsibility.Matthew Talbert - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):139-152.
In Praise of Blame - By George Sher.J. E. Tiles - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (1):78-80.
In Praise of Blame—George Sher.Raymond Dennehy - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):125-127.
Sher’s Defense of Blame. [REVIEW]Pamela Hieronymi - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):19-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-06

Total views
753 ( #9,736 of 2,506,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #38,780 of 2,506,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes