MCDSARE 4 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
For centuries, science was considered as something radically different from religion. Yet, the foundations of true science are deeply religious in nature. This paper seeks to show how religion is the only foundation needed for the formulation of scientific theories, since it provides the core principles on which the building of exact sciences is based upon. Our need to understand the cosmos and our faith in us being able to do so, are the main prerequisites for conducting science; prerequisites that are derived from our belief in us being the sons of God and, thus, being able to read His mind. From its birth on 7 March 1277 up to today, science seems to be the only logical attitude of religious people towards the unknown cosmos.
|
| Keywords | science science philosophy axioms science principles foundations of science |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
From Galileo to Hubble: Copernican Principle as a Philosophical Dogma Defining Modern Astronomy.Spyridon Kakos - 2018 - International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science 2 (3):13-37.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Untrustworthiness of Axiomatic-Founded Science.Spyridon Kakos - 2020 - Harmonia Philosophica.
Religion and Science Unification.Spyridon Kakos - 2017 - International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science 1 (1):78-95.
The Alleged Demise of Religion: Greatly Exaggerated Reports From the Science/Religion ÂWarsâ.Del Ratzsch - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 69--84.
Rethinking Religious Language in the Age of Science.Koshy Tharakan - 2008 - Journal of Dharma 33 (1-4):405-411.
Scientific Ethics: A New Approach.Marcello Menapace - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1193-1216.
On the autonomy of scientific and theological discourses.Igor Nevvazhay - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):140-151.
What Significance Does Christianity Have for Science Education?Michael J. Reiss - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1637-1662.
Science, Religion, and Pedagogy: Teachers’ Perspectives.Nasser Mansour - 2019 - In Berry Billingsley, Keith Chappell & Michael J. Reiss (eds.), Science and Religion in Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 315-336.
Religion is Easy, but Science is Hard … Understanding McCauley's Thesis.James A. Van Slyke - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):696-707.
The Role of Philosophy in the Religion-Science Dialogue.Hong Bodian - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (4):109-118.
Science and Religion: Why Does the Debate Continue?Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 299--316.
Science, Religion, and Naturalism: Metaphysical and Methodological Incompatibilities.Marin Mahner - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1793-1835.
Śūnyatā and Kokoro: Science–Religion Dialogue in the Japanese Context.Seung Chul Kim - 2015 - Zygon 50 (1):155-171.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-12-06
Total views
187 ( #61,623 of 2,498,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #32,442 of 2,498,779 )
2020-12-06
Total views
187 ( #61,623 of 2,498,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #32,442 of 2,498,779 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
