The Alleged Demise of Religion: Greatly Exaggerated Reports from the Science/Religion “Wars”

In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 69--84 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: * I Refutation: some preliminaries * II Foundations – Deep Conflict? * III Epistemic Undertows: Dissolving Rationality * IV Conflicting Mindsets * V Historical Erosion * VII Conflict and Rational Justification * VII Conclusion * Acknowledgments * Notes

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9781444317350   9781405189217

DOI

10.1002/9781444317350.ch3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science and Religion: Why Does the Debate Continue?Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 299--316.
Does cognitive science show belief in god to be irrational? The epistemic consequences of the cognitive science of religion.Joshua C. Thurow - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
Are science and religion natural enemies?Peter G. Woolcock - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):1.
The justification of science and the rationality of religious belief.Michael C. Banner - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Augustinian Science: Alvin Plantinga’s Idea on Philosophizing and Scientific Theorizing Based on Religious Belief.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Dissertation, Mofid University
Whose Science and Whose Religion? Reflections on the Relations between Scientific and Religious Worldviews.Stuart Glennan - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):797-812.
Naturalistic Foundations of the Idea of the Holy: Darwinian Roots of Rudolf Otto's Theology.Mladen Turk - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (35):248-263.
The Religious Roots of Science.Del Ratzsch - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 54--68.
God, Design, and Naturalism: Implications of Methodological Naturalism in Science for Science–Religion Relation.Piotr Bylica & Dariusz Sagan - 2008 - Pensamiento 64 (242):621-38.
What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism.Reed Richter - 2002 - Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Religious Realism.Bruce Reichenbach - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1034--1052.
Religion is easy, but science is hard … understanding McCauley's thesis.James A. Van Slyke - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):696-707.
Methodology of Augustinian Science.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.
Religious Belief and the Problems of Cognitivity and Commitment: A Reappraisal Based on Contemporary Philosophy of Science.Richard Alan Knopp - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-04

Downloads
84 (#193,318)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Del Ratzsch
Calvin University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references