- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Embryo Research: Are There Any Lessons from Natural Reproduction?
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):68-75 (2004)
Abstract
John Harris gives a comprehensive and generally valid defense of embryo research. Although nearly all his arguments are valid, one—the argument comparing natural reproduction to embryo research—is problematic in several important ways. I focus here on that argumentAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons from Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies.Julian Savulescu & John Harris - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):90-95.
Consequentialism without Consequences: Ethics and Embryo Research.Sarah Chan & John Harris - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):61.
Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.Katrien Devolder - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):533-536.
Arguing along the slippery slope of human embryo research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
Response to “The Creation Lottery” by Julian Savulescu and John Harris : The Creation Lottery and Method in Bioethics: A Comment on Savulescu and Harris. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):283-287.
Actualizable Potential, Reproduction, and Embryo Research: Bringing Embryos into Existence for Different Purposes or Not at All.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):51.
Sexual Reproduction Is a Survival Lottery.John Harris - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):75-90.
IVF technology and the argument from potential.Peter Singer & Karen Dawson - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):87-104.
The Human Embryo Research Panel: Lessons for Public Ethics.Ronald M. Green - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (4):502.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
90 (#62,816)
6 months
3 (#1,723,834)
2010-08-24
Downloads
90 (#62,816)
6 months
3 (#1,723,834)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Anti-abortionist Action Theory and the Asymmetry between Spontaneous and Induced Abortions.Matthew Lee Anderson - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (3):209-224.
A Reexamination of In Vitro Fertilization.Michael G. Muñoz - 2023 - Christian Bioethics 29 (1):21-30.
Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.Katrien Devolder - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):533-536.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo