Direct organ solicitation deserves reconsideration

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):558-558 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The United Network for Organ Sharing , the national organisation responsible for transplantable organ distribution in the United States, recently condemned the direct solicitation of organs in situations “where no personal bond exists between the patient and the donor or donor family”.1 UNOS worries that “such appeals, although well-intentioned, compromise the principle of fairness” or worse, “may divert organs from patients with critical need to those who are less ill.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organ Conscription and Greater Needs.Alexander Zambrano - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (1):123-133.
Justice and the Macroallocation of Human Donor Organs.Michael James Booker - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Notes from an Organ Recipient: Once is Enough.Annie Klebahn Condon - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):400-402.
Organ Transplant Allocation.Pat Milmoe McCarrick - 1995 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5 (4):365-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
100 (#171,220)

6 months
20 (#172,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Lott
Loyola University, New Orleans

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references