Meinongs much maligned modal moment
Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118 (2002)
Abstract
Russell's objections to object-theory have been refuted by the proofs of the consistency of Meinong's system given by various writers. These proofs exploit technical distinctions that Meinong apparently uses very little if at all. Instead, Meinong introduces a theoretical postulate called the modal moment. I describe this postulate and its place in Meinong's system, and I argue that it has been much under-rated by Meinong's logician expositors.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1163/18756735-90000776
My notes
Similar books and articles
Psychological content and indeterminacy with respect to being : Two notes on the Russell-meinong debate.Johann Christian Marek - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Impossible objects.Karel Lambert - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):303 – 314.
Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic.Karel Lambert - 1983 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Contra meinong.Peter Loptson - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Meditations on meinong's golden mountain.Dale Jacquette - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Introduction: Russell and Meinong in retrospect.Dale Jacquette - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#273,589)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#273,589)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Meinong on Intending.Andrew Kenneth Jorgensen - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):415-427.