Meinong’s much maligned modal moment

Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russell's objections to object-theory have been refuted by the proofs of the consistency of Meinong's system given by various writers. These proofs exploit technical distinctions that Meinong apparently uses very little if at all. Instead, Meinong introduces a theoretical postulate called the modal moment. I describe this postulate and its place in Meinong's system, and I argue that it has been much under-rated by Meinong's logician expositors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#273,589)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Jorgensen
Temple University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Meinong on Intending.Andrew Kenneth Jorgensen - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):415-427.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references