Does a Sentiment‐Based Ethics of Caring Improve upon a Principles‐Based One? The problem of impartial morality

Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (3):436-452 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My task in this paper is to demonstrate, contra Nel Noddings, that Kantian ethics does not have an expectation of treating those closest to one the same as one would a stranger. In fact, Kantian ethics has what I would consider a robust statement of how it is that those around us come to figure prominently in the development of one's ethics. To push the point even further, I argue that Kantian ethics has an even stronger claim to treating those closest to oneself as imperative than Noddings and sentiment‐based ethical theory in general, proposes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
11 (#1,167,245)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Scott Johnston
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Citations of this work

Why there is no education ethics without principles.Janez Krek & Blaž Zabel - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (3):284-293.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gesammelte Schriften. Kant - 1912 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 73:105-106.
The Value of Agency. [REVIEW]Paul Guyer - 1993 - Ethics 106 (2):404-423.

Add more references