Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism

Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary theories of Virtue Ethics are often presented as being in opposition to Kantian Ethics and Consequentialism. It is argued that Virtue Ethics takes as fundamental the question, “What sort of character would a virtuous person have?” and that Kantian Ethics and Consequentialism take as fundamental the question, “What makes an action right?” I argue that this opposition is misconceived. The opposition is rather between Virtue Ethics and Kantian Ethics on the one hand and Consequentialism on the other. The former two are concerned with, respectively, the development of a virtuous character and a good will, whereas Consequentialism is essentially a doctrine that just provides a justification of the right option without specifying how this is to be achieved. Furthermore, I show that Consequentialism, interpreted as a justificatory doctrine, is both an impoverished doctrine and one that cannot be enriched by taking a “pick and mix” approach to other ethical theories in the way that Consequentialists advocate. I argue that there is at least one reason to prefer Kantian Ethics: Kantian Ethics necessarily avoids the objection of selfcenteredness, whereas the avoidance of this objection is only contingent in the case of Virtue Ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Third Method of Ethics?Roger Crisp - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (2):257-273.
Karma, Character, and Consequentialism.Damien Keown - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):329-350.
Kantian consequentialism.David Cummiskey - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Virtue Ethics.Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Virtue consequentialism.Ben Bradley - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (3):282-298.
The Fundamentals of Ethics.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
160 (#80,321)

6 months
8 (#105,188)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the “Virtue Turn” and the Problem of Categorizing Chinese Thought.Eric L. Hutton - 2015 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (3):331-353.
Modern Moral Philosophy Before and After.Constantine Sandis - 2020 - Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía 64.
Kant-Bibliographie 2002.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (4):505-538.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references