Authors
Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College
Abstract
Pediatric health care workers often perform, promote, and advocate use of public funds for animal research . We aim to determine whether HCW consider common arguments in support of AR convincing
Keywords Survey  Animals  Animal research  Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/s13010-014-0020-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Animals: An Introduction.Lori Gruen - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Contractarianism and Animal Rights.Mark Rowlands - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (3):235–247.
The Scope of the Argument From Species Overlap.Oscar Horta - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):142-154.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moralność naukowców eksperymentujących na zwierzętach.Andrzej Elżanowski - 2015 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 94 (2):287-299, 470-471.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Care Worker Migration and Transnational Justice.Lisa A. Eckenwiler - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):171-183.
Can a Chimp Say "No"? Reenvisioning Chimpanzee Dissent in Harmful Research.Andrew Fenton - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):130-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-12-31

Total views
21 ( #537,246 of 2,519,275 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,275 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes