Huntington or Halliburton? The Real Clash of Civilizations in American Life

Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (8):42-54 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A wide variety of sources, including the Huntington literature and popular mass media, show that Huntington’s “clash of civilizations” idea actually has very little value in understanding the current global political context. The central assumption of Huntington’s view, that cultural kinship ties influence loyalties and agreements on a global scale, has little to do with the daily lives of American citizens and little to do with the decisions made by the current presidential administration. The mass media evidence from the United States shows that the most important “kinship” ties are not religious or cultural, but economic. The argument involves a deeper analysis of the current trend towards religious programs on American television, a timeline of events relating to the Halliburton – Cheney relationship, and views expressed by members of the United States military in Stars and Stripes.

Similar books and articles

Beyond the Social Imaginary of 'Clash of Civilizations'?Fazal Rizvi - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):225-235.
Confucian value and democratic value.Chenyang Li - 1997 - Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (2):183-193.
Introduction.Johan Verstraeten - 1994 - Ethical Perspectives 1 (1):1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-29

Downloads
1,601 (#530)

6 months
92 (#181,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine James
Valdosta State University

Citations of this work

The New Millenium and the Age of Terror. Literature and the Figure in the Carpet.Florin Oprescu - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (36):51-71.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references