Common Consent Arguments for Belief in God

Dialogue: A Journal of Philosophy and Religion (58):17-22 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A popular introduction to common consent arguments for belief in God

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Consensus Gentium: Reflections on the 'Common Consent' Argument for the Existence of God.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
The Argument from Common Consent.Jonathan Matheson - 2021 - In Colin Ruloff & Peter Horban (eds.), Contemporary Arguments in Natural Theology: God and Rational Belief. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Is the fact that other people believe in God a reason to believe? Remarks on the consensus gentium argument.Marek Dobrzeniecki - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):133-153.
pt. 3. Evidence and religious belief. Consensus gentium : reflections on the 'common consent' argument for the existence of God. [REVIEW]Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
Skeptical Theism and Morriston’s Humean Argument from Evil.Timothy Perrine - 2019 - Sophia 58 (2):115-135.
Posthumous reproduction and the presumption against consent in cases of death caused by sudden trauma.Rebecca Collins - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):431 – 442.
How to Debunk Animism.Perry Hendricks - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (2):543-550.
Inferring Consent without Communication.Mollie Gerver - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (1):27-53.
How to obtain informed consent for psychotherapy: a reply to criticism.Garson Leder - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):450-451.
The Common Consent Argument for the Existence of Nature Spirits.Tiddy Smith - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):334-348.
Constructive “Consent”: A Problematic Fiction.M. Beth Valentine - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (5):499-521.
Beliefs and Testimony as Social Evidence: Epistemic Egoism, Epistemic Universalism, and Common Consent Arguments.Joshua Rollins - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):78-90.
Kantian and Utilitarian Democracy.David A. Lloyd Thomas - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):395 - 413.
Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology, Skeptical Theism, and Debunking Arguments.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (4):449-470.
How do philosophers evaluate natural theological arguments? An experimental philosophical investigation.Helen De Cruz - 2016 - In Helen De Cruz & Ryan Nichols (eds.), Advances in Religion, Cognitive Science, and Experimental Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 119-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-29

Downloads
241 (#83,476)

6 months
83 (#57,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcus Hunt
Concordia University Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essay concerning human understanding.John Locke - 1924 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Consensus Gentium: Reflections on the 'Common Consent' Argument for the Existence of God.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
Can Atheism Be Epistemically Responsible When So Many People Believe in God?Sébasten Réhault - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):181--198.
The Common Consent Argument from Herbert to Hume.Jasper Reid - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (3):401-433.
Epistemic self-trust and the consensus gentium argument.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.

Add more references