The Common Consent Argument for the Existence of Nature Spirits

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):334-348 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The traditional common consent argument for the existence of God has largely been abandoned—and rightly so. In this paper, I attempt to salvage the strongest version of the argument. Surprisingly,...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00048402.2019.1621912

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Religious disagreement: internal and external. [REVIEW]Dennis Potter - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
The Common Consent Argument from Herbert to Hume.Jasper Reid - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (3):401-433.
Introducing philosophy of religion.Chad V. Meister - 2009 - New York: Routledge.
The X-claim argument against religious belief offers nothing new.Justin McBrayer & Weston Ellis - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (2):223-232.
Consensus Gentium: Reflections on the 'Common Consent' Argument for the Existence of God.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
pt. 3. Evidence and religious belief. Consensus gentium : reflections on the 'common consent' argument for the existence of God. [REVIEW]Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
The Explanatory Challenge of Religious Diversity.Jason Marsh & Jon Marsh - 2016 - In Helen De Cruz & Ryan Nichols (eds.), Advances in Religion, Cognitive Science, and Experimental Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 61-83.
Can Atheism Be Epistemically Responsible When So Many People Believe in God?Sébasten Réhault - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):181--198.
Understanding Hume's natural history of religion.P. J. E. Kail - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
The Equal Weight Argument Against Religious Exclusivism.Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2013 - In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer.
The Hypothetical Consent Objection to Anti-Natalism.Asheel Singh - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (5):1135-1150.
The Argument from Religious Experience: D. G. ATTFIELD.D. G. Attfield - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (3):335-343.
A Comparative Study of the Argument from Common Consensus and That From Human Innate Nature For the Existence of God.Muhammad Muhammadrezaee - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 10 (40):109-125.
Ocr Philosophy of Religion for as and A.Matthew Taylor - 2007 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Jon Mayled & Matthew Taylor.
Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology, Skeptical Theism, and Debunking Arguments.Andrew Moon - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (4):449-470.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-03

Downloads
281 (#72,149)

6 months
33 (#103,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism.Matthew Braddock - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (3):189-210.
Animism: Its Scope and Limits.Graham Oppy - 2022 - In Tiddy Smith (ed.), Animism and Philosophy of Religion. Springer Verlag. pp. 199-226.
How to Debunk Animism.Perry Hendricks - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (2):543-550.
Rethinking Ao Naga traditional religion.Tiatemsu Longkumer - 2022 - Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 39 (2):99-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Warranted Christian Belief.Alvin Plantinga - 2000 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):381-390.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (2):279-279.
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.

View all 15 references / Add more references