The Pregnancy Rescue Case: Why Abortion is Immoral

Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In cases in which we must choose between either (i) preventing a woman from remaining unwillingly pregnant or (ii) preventing a fetus from being killed, we should prevent the fetus from being killed. But this suggests that in typical cases abortion is wrong: typical abortions involve preventing a woman from remaining unwillingly pregnant over preventing a fetus from being killed. So abortion is typically wrong—and this holds whether or not fetuses are persons.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The embryo rescue case.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Is Abortion the Only Issue?Dustin Crummett - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.
Liability for failing to rescue.TheodoreM Benditt - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (3):391 - 418.
Creation and Abortion: An Essay in Moral and Legal Philosophy.F. M. Kamm - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Basic Beliefs, the Embryo Rescue Case, and Single-Issue Voting.Tyler McNabb & Michael DeVito - 2021 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 21 (2):203-208.
Rescuing the Duty to Rescue.Tina Rulli & Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics:1-5.
Climbing high and letting die.Patrick Findler - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (1):10-25.
Collectivizing Rescue Obligations in Bioethics.Jeremy R. Garrett - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):3-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-11

Downloads
823 (#17,830)

6 months
414 (#4,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Perry Hendricks
Purdue University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references