John Locke’s seed lists: a case study in botanical exchange

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):256-264 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper gives a detailed analysis of four seed lists in the journals of John Locke. These lists provide a window into a fascinating open network of botanical exchange in the early 1680s which included two of the leading botanists of the day. Pierre Magnol of Montpellier and Jacob Bobart the Younger of Oxford. The provenance and significance of the lists are assessed in relation to the relevant extant herbaria and plant catalogues from the period. The lists and associated correspondence provide the main evidence for Locke's own important, through modest contribution to early modern botany, a contribution which he would have regarded as a small part of the broader project of constructing a natural history of plants. They also provide a detailed case study of the sort of open and informal network of knowledge exchange in the early modern period that is widely recognised by historians of science, but all too rarely illustrated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locke and botany.Peter R. Anstey & Stephen A. Harris - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2):151-171.
Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence: Scribal exchange in early modern science.Elizabeth Yale - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):193-202.
The voting by open lists: European experience and applicability in Ukraine.O. Gordiychuk & A. Lyubchak - 2017 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 35 (1):179-185.
Draughtsmen, botanists and nature: constructing eighteenth-century botanical illustrations.Kärin Nickelsen - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):1-25.
Review of John Locke and Natural Philosophy. [REVIEW]Jan-Erik Jones - 2012 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2012.
Draughtsmen, botanists and nature: constructing eighteenth-century botanical illustrations.Kärin Nickelsen - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (1):1-25.
Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence: Scribal exchange in early modern science.Elizabeth Yale - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):193-202.
Networked names: synonyms in eighteenth-century botany.Bettina Dietz - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (4):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-12

Downloads
51 (#303,696)

6 months
20 (#173,532)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence: Scribal exchange in early modern science.Elizabeth Yale - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):193-202.
Marginalia, commonplaces, and correspondence: Scribal exchange in early modern science.Elizabeth Yale - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):193-202.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The correspondence of John Locke.John Locke - 1976 - New York: Clarendon Press. Edited by Esmond Samuel De Beer.
The Library of John Locke.John Locke, John R. Harrison & Peter Laslett - 1971 - Published for the Oxford Bibliographical Society by the Oxford University Press.
Locke, Bacon and Natural History.Peter R. Anstey - 2002 - Early Science and Medicine 7 (1):65-92.
Locke and botany.Peter R. Anstey & Stephen A. Harris - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2):151-171.

View all 7 references / Add more references