Review of John Locke and Natural Philosophy [Book Review]

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2012 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a review of Peter Anstey's John Locke and Natural Philosophy, which is a masterful and well-argued study of Locke's philosophy of science that shall become both the standard and starting place, for scholars and students alike, for decades to come. Anstey's meticulous and thorough research, combined with his comprehensive knowledge of the history of natural philosophy, make this work a must-read for all who are interested in Locke, early modern philosophy, the history of the philosophy of science, or early modern philosophy of science. His characteristically rigorous analysis and argumentation coupled with his easy and clear prose make this a highly readable and accessible work of scholarship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,354

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Locke & Natural Philosophy (review).Antonia LoLordo - 2012 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (2):296-297.
John Locke and natural philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Locke and Natural Philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 64-81.
Locke, Bacon and Natural History.Peter R. Anstey - 2002 - Early Science and Medicine 7 (1):65-92.
Peter R. Anstey. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Pp. xii+252. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. $65.00. [REVIEW]Benjamin Hill - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):382-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-13

Downloads
59 (#267,726)

6 months
8 (#516,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references