1. the relation between positive and normative economics confusion between positive and normative economics is to some extent inevitable. The subject matter of economics is regarded by almost everyone from essays in positive economics (chicago: University of chicago press, 1953), part I, sections 1, 2, 3, and 6.Positive Economics & Milton Friedman
X equity, arrow S conditions, and Rawls's difference principlei Peter J. Hammond.Arrow S. Conditions Equity
Similar books and articles
Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry.Subroto Roy - 1989 - Routledge.
Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics.Drucilla K. Barker & Edith Kuiper (eds.) - 2003 - Routledge.
Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate.Steve Fleetwood (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Happiness, Economics and Politics: Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Approach.Amitava Krishna Dutt & Benjamin Radcliff (eds.) - 2009 - Edward Elgar.
Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms.Vernon L. Smith - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR.Philipp Schreck, Dominik van Aaken & Thomas Donaldson - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):297-329.
Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made.Peter J. Hammond - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. pp. 200--254.
The Visible Hand of Morality. [REVIEW]Peter Danielson - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):357-384.
Commitment as Motivation: Amartya Sen’s Theory of Agency and the Explanation of Behavior.Ann E. Cudd - 2014 - Economics and Philosophy 30 (1):35-56.
References found in this work
No references found.