Defeasibility Theory

In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 156-166 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a survey article about epistemic defeaters: what is defeated, how defeaters work, different kinds of defeaters, indefeasibility and how defeaters fit into epistemic internalism and externalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Undefeated dualism.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):445-466.
Reliabilism and the problem of defeaters.Thomas Grundmann - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):65-76.
Understanding undermining defeat.Giacomo Melis - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):433-442.
Defeaters and higher-level requirements.Michael Bergmann - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):419–436.
Justification and Misleading Defeaters.James Cargile - 1995 - Analysis 55 (3):216 - 220.
'Partial defeaters' and the epistemology of disagreement.Michael Thune - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):355-372.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
3 (#1,686,544)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Grundmann
University of Cologne

References found in this work

Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.

Add more references