Educational Theory 64 (6):627-648 (2014)

Maughn Rollins Gregory
Montclair State University
Recent articles on teaching controversial topics in schools have employed Michael Hand's distinction between “directive teaching,” in which teachers attempt to persuade students of correct positions on topics that are not rationally controversial, and “nondirective teaching,” in which teachers avoid persuading students on topics that are rationally controversial. However, the four methods of directive teaching discussed in the literature — explicit directive teaching, “steering,” “soft-directive teaching,” and “school ethos endorsement” — make rational persuasion problematic, if not self-defeating. In this essay, Maughn Rollins Gregory argues that “procedurally directive teaching” offers an alternative to such approaches because it derives from the intention to guide inquiry rather than to persuade. He demonstrates that the conceptual frameworks of perfectionism and antiperfectionism, which have been proposed for directive teaching on same-sex marriage, can instead be used to generate open questions for student inquiry, as can a third, civil rights framework. Given these considerations, Gregory maintains that pedagogical guidance on this topic should be procedurally directive rather than substantively directive. Further, the fact that legal, political, and ethics scholars disagree about which framework is more appropriate to the issue of same-sex marriage indicates that such arguments cannot be dispositive of the pedagogical issue of how to frame classroom discussions about it. Rather, students should inquire into this meta-level framing dispute for themselves
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/edth.12087
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Assessment, Truth and Religious Studies.John Tillson - 2019 - Studies in Philosophy and Education (2):195-210.
Teaching Controversial Issues: A Pragmatic View of the Criterion Debate.Emil Sætra - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 53 (2):323-339.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards a Theory of Propositional Curriculum Content.John Tillson - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (1):137-148.
Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom.Michael Hand & Ralph Levinson - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (6):614-629.
Towards a Theory of Moral Education.Michael Hand - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (4):519-532.
Teaching About Homosexuality and Heterosexuality.Michael J. Reiss - 1997 - Journal of Moral Education 26 (3):343-352.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #335,078 of 2,506,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes