Assessment, Truth and Religious Studies

Studies in Philosophy and Education (2):195-210 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of what should determine whether students’ answers to closed questions are marked as correct or incorrect in the context of formal religious education, and when their answers to open ended questions should be given more or less credit. Drawing on insights from Craig Bourne, Emily Caddick Bourne and Clare Jarmy, I argue that a combination of judged truth, and a range of well-argued cases about what ought to be believed given certain premises should constrain these assessment practices. Furthermore, I argue that if we cannot find any consistent, nonarbitrary account of how judgements of correctness and merit are in fact being made in the context of formal religious education, then this tells more against current practice’s inconsistency and arbitrariness than against these constraints on how judgements of correctness and merit should be made.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Favour of Ethics Education, Against Religious Education.John Tillson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):675-688.
Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
Making sense of relative truth.John MacFarlane - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):321–339.
Truthmakers.Fraser MacBride - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Tillson
Liverpool Hope University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry.Bernard Williams (ed.) - 1978 - Hassocks [Eng.]: Routledge.
A survey of metaphysics.E. Jonathan Lowe - 2002 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry.Bernard Williams - 1978 - Hassocks [Eng.]: Routledge.
A Theory of Moral Education.Michael Hand - 2017 - London: Routledge.

View all 18 references / Add more references