- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens
Aaron J. Goldenberg, Karen J. Maschke, Steven Joffe, Jeffrey R. Botkin, Erin Rothwell, Thomas H. Murray, Rebecca Anderson, Nicole Deming, Beth F. Rosenthal & Suzanne M. Rivera
BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):32 (2015)
Abstract
As sharing and secondary research use of biospecimens increases, IRBs and researchers face the challenge of protecting and respecting donors without comprehensive regulations addressing the human subject protection issues posed by biobanking. Variation in IRB biobanking policies about these issues has not been well documentedLinks
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Take Another Little Piece of My Heart1: Regulating the Research Use of Human Biospecimens.Gail H. Javitt - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):424-439.
A Role for Research Ethics Committees in Exchanges of Human Biospecimens Through Material Transfer Agreements.Donald Chalmers, Dianne Nicol, Pilar Nicolás & Nikolajs Zeps - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):301-306.
Biobanking and data sharing: a plurality of exchange regimes.Fabien Milanovic, David Pontille & Anne Cambon-Thomsen - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1):1-14.
Between Sharing and Protecting: Public research on genetic resources in the year of the potato.Bram de Jonge - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (3):1-16.
Between sharing and protecting: Public research in the year of the potato.B. Jonge - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (3).
‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?Serepkaite Jurate, Valuckiene Zivile & Gefenas Eugenijus - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):1-15.
Third-Party Risks in Research: Should IRBs Address Them?Daniel Hausman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (3).
Irb Policies Regarding Finder’s Fees And Role Conflicts In Recruiting Research Participants.Leslie Wolf - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (1):14-19.
Consent for Future Genetic Research: The NHANES Experience in 2007–2008.Geraldine Mcquillan & Kathryn Porter - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (1):9-14.
International Perspectives on the Collection, Storage, and Testing of Human Biospecimens in HIV Research.Kathleen Macqueen & Patty Alleman - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (4):9-14.
Benefit-sharing: an inquiry regarding the meaning and limits of the concept in human genetic research.Kadri Simm - 2005 - Genomics, Society and Policy 1 (2):1-12.
Institutional Barriers to Research on Sensitive Topics: Case of Sex Communication Research Among University Students.Carey M. Noland - 2012 - Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - M2.
Sharing Scientific Data I: New Problems for IRBs.Joan E. Sieber - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (6):4.
Open consent, biobanking and data protection law: can open consent be ‘informed’ under the forthcoming data protection regulation?Michael Friedewald & Dara Hallinan - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-36.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-05-08
Downloads
45 (#350,446)
6 months
12 (#207,641)
2015-05-08
Downloads
45 (#350,446)
6 months
12 (#207,641)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Broad Consent Is Consent for Governance.Sarah N. Boers, Johannes J. M. van Delden & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):53-55.
Clarifying how to deploy the public interest criterion in consent waivers for health data and tissue research.G. Owen Schaefer, Graeme Laurie, Sumytra Menon, Alastair V. Campbell & Teck Chuan Voo - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-10.
Should Epidemiological Studies Be Subject to Ethics Review?Jan Piasecki, Vilius Dranseika & Marcin Waligora - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):213-220.
Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.Angela Ballantyne & Andrew Moore - 2018 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):143-153.
More Nuanced Informed Consent Is Not Necessarily Better Informed Consent.Danielle Hornstein, Sharon Nakar, Sara Weinberger & Dov Greenbaum - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):51-53.
References found in this work
The Role of IRBs in Research Involving Commerical Biobanks.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.
Biobanking, Consent, and Certificates of Confidentiality: Does the ANPRM Muddy the Water?Brett A. Williams & Leslie E. Wolf - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):440-453.
Identifiability of DNA Data: The Need for Consistent Federal Policy.Amy L. McGuire - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):75-76.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (1):105-108.
Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice.Leslie E. Wolf, Timothy A. Bouley & Charles E. McCulloch - 2010 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (2):7.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-vwmnd uwo