Biobanking, Consent, and Certificates of Confidentiality: Does the ANPRM Muddy the Water?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):440-453 (2013)

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has proposed substantial changes to the current regulatory system governing human subjects research in its Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, entitled “Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators.” Some of the most significant proposed changes concern the use of biospecimens in research. Because research involving biological materials begins with an initial interaction with an individual, such research falls squarely within the human subjects research regulatory framework known as the “Common Rule,” which applies to research conducted or funded by the HHS and the other signatory agencies and departments. However, as described in detail below, much biospecimen research may fall within exemptions and exceptions under the Common Rule and, thus, may be conducted without consent. The ANPRM proposes requiring written consent for research use of biospecimens, even if the biospecimens were initially collected for a purpose other than research or have been stripped of identifiers.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-27

Downloads
39 (#295,424)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Similar books and articles

Biobanking and Privacy Laws in Australia.Don Chalmers - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):703-713.