Memory‐Based Deception Detection: Extending the Cognitive Signature of Lying From Instructed to Self‐Initiated Cheating

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2):608-631 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Geven, Ben‐Shakhar, Kindt and Verschuere point out that research on deception detection usually employs instructed cheating. They experimentally demonstrate that participants show slower reaction times for concealed information than for other information, regardless of whether they are explicitly instructed to cheat or whether they can freely choose to cheat or not. Finding this ‘cognitive signature of lying’ with self‐initiated cheating too is argued by the authors to strengthen the external validity of deception detection research. [75]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-deceive to countermine detection.Hui Jing Lu & Lei Chang - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):33-33.
Cheating in Exams with Technology.Kevin Curran, Gary Middleton & Ciaran Doherty - 2011 - International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (2):54-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-17

Downloads
35 (#470,483)

6 months
4 (#862,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?