Self-deceive to countermine detection

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):33-33 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Having evolved to escape detection of deception completely, self-deception must respond to social conditions registering different probabilities of detection. To be adaptive, it must have a mechanism to keep truthful information temporarily from the self during deception and retrieve it after deception. The memory system may serve this mechanism and provides a paradigm in which to conduct research on self-deception

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lying and Deception.Don Fallis - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.
On the definition of lying: A reply to Jones and revisions.Thomas L. Carson - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):509-514.
Lying and intentions.Gary E. Jones - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):347-349.
Liar Liar.Thomas Carson - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):189-210.
Varieties of Insincerity.Christine McKinnon - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
Enhancing our truth orientation.Robin Hanson - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press. pp. 357--372.
Deception.Leonard Linsky - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):157 – 169.
On defining truth.Frank Deaver - 1990 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 5 (3):168 – 177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
39 (#399,999)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?