Why dynamical implementation matters

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):641-642 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Another objection to the dynamical hypothesis is explored. To resolve it completely, one must focus more directly on an area not emphasized in van Gelder's discussion: the contributions of dynamical systems theory to understanding how cognition is neutrally implemented.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is the dynamical hypothesis?Nick Chater & Ulrike Hahn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):633-634.
What might dynamical intentionality be, if not computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
The dynamical hypothesis in social cognition.J. Richard Eiser - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):638-638.
Extended Cognitive Systems and Extended Cognitive Processes.Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa - 2008 - In Frederick Adams & Kenneth Aizawa (eds.), The Bounds of Cognition. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 106–132.
The dynamical model is a perceptron.Bruce Bridgeman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):631-632.
Revolution, no! Reform, si!Daniel C. Dennett - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):636-637.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
28 (#553,444)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James W. Garson
University of Houston

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references