A Psychological Investigation of Nelson Goodman’s Theory of Symbols

The Monist 58 (2):319-326 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the conclusion of Languages of Art Nelson Goodman suggests that his theory of symbols has implications which extend beyond the philosopher’s chambers. He indicates that an exploration of the distinctions and framework introduced in the book might lead to revisions in educational psychology. Work undertaken in recent years by Goodman and his associates at Harvard Project Zero has been directly concerned with the psychological and educational implications of the theory of symbols. I would like to describe some early results of this research, particularly as it concerns two of the concepts discussed in Languages of Art: notationality and similarity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic, art, and understanding in the philosophy of Nelson Goodman.Günter Abel - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):311 – 321.
Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols.B. C. O'Neill - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (85):361.
Review of Nelson Goodman: Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols[REVIEW]Cyril Barrett - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):187-198.
A tribute to Nelson Goodman.Curtis Carter - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (3):251-253.
Using Goodman to Explore Historical Representation.Eugen Zeleňák - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):371-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
63 (#254,928)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references