Significantes estéticos y arquitectura: límite y crítica de la teoría de los símbolos de Nelson Goodman

Quaderns De Filosofia I Ciència 40:97-104 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The development of the main conclusions drawn in Nelson Goodman’s Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols in the particular case of architecture, shows some weaknesses in the general theory of the aesthetic symbol system. Following these, we present an alternative to epistemological objectivity assisted by the theory of the oscillating aesthetic object

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic, art, and understanding in the philosophy of Nelson Goodman.Günter Abel - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):311 – 321.
Construction and "worldmaking": the significance of Nelson Goodman's pluralism.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez - 2009 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 24 (2):213-225.
The 'Umbau' - from Constitution Theory to Constructional Ontology.Johanna Seibt - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):305 - 348.
Contextualist References in Nelson Goodman's Solution to the “New Riddle of Induction”.Ansgar Seide - 2009 - In Gerhard Ernst, Jakob Steinbrenner & Oliver R. Scholz (eds.), From Logic to Art: Themes from Nelson Goodman. Frankfurt: Ontos. pp. 7--121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references