To Follow the Argument Wherever It Leads

The Reasoner 3 (11):5-6 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper rejects the claim that, rationally, we should follow the argument wherever it leads.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of religion: classic and contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Is it Wise to Teach our Students to Follow the Argument Wherever it Leads?Isaac Nevo - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):157-172.
The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement.Diego E. Machuca - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2):148-161.
The simulation argument and the self-indication assumption.Paul Franceschi - unknown
Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument.C. Waidacher - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
A refutation of the doomsday argument.Kevin B. Korb & Jonathan J. Oliver - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):403-410.
Let's dance! The equivocation in Chalmers' dancing qualia argument.B. van Heuveln, Eric Dietrich & M. Oshima - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):237-249.
Following the argument where it leads.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (1):105-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-04

Downloads
700 (#22,446)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references